
Saturday, 20 December 2008
Friday, 5 December 2008
Climate Safety

Wednesday, 3 December 2008
80% by 2050 - legal assent
The CCC have recommended a 34% (cf 1990) cut in CO2 emissions by 2020 - see their press release here.
In addition they have published a huge document on creating a low carbon economy based on the new legislation. This is clearly and important document which I have yet to read - it is downloadable here.
This is important stuff - visit the web site - 34% cuts in CO2 in 12 years time is a stiff target which can only be achieved by major change
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
One Shot Left
He has based his conclusions on the recent findings of Jim Hansen the NASA climate specialist. Hansen assets that 350ppm is the safe level of CO2 in the atmosphere (we are currently above 380ppm) and anything above that could lead to rapid catastrophic climate change across the globe.
Monbiot also refers to the work of the Public Interest Research Centre who are holding a conference on the topic on Thursday 27th Nov.
The science has moved on rapidly from the 2007 IPCC reports, ice sheets melting much more rapidly, methane venting from the tundra etc etc etc.
It is obviously time to act (80% by 2050) but have we left it too late.......
Gloomy, Monbiot, may be but One Shot Left is essential reading.
Friday, 14 November 2008
National Parks and the National Trust in the uplands
Thursday, 13 November 2008
Peak oil and Local Authorities
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
350
Read thier website - can you disagree?
We are currently at 387ppm - politicians state that 450 ppm will be OK.
Current global economic policies if unchanged will take us to 800ppm.
Irreversible climate change is likely to occur between 35--450-550 ppm.
The precautionary principle? or Russian Roulette? Its up to us.
Happy 2nd birthday Bovey Climate Action

Monday, 10 November 2008
Methane levels up -but why?

Save paper - don't press PRINT
In addition he mentions a computer programme Greenprint which analyses the document you are about to print and eliminates any unwanted or wasted pages.
In addition he champions the use of pdf files - these produce tidy presentable files that can be read on screen without the need to print them out. Abode Acrobat is the market leader obviously, but Cutepdf is a free alternative.
Thursday, 30 October 2008
The Oil Crunch
The Oil Crunch is a report just published by 8 of the UK's leading companies (Virgin, Scottish and Southern Energy, Stagecoach, Arup, Foster and partners, Yahoo, First and Solarcentury).
In essence they believe that we face an imminent crisis arising from oil supply in the UK - this might occur as early as 2011. This is a quote from the Executive summary.
Currently, it seems to us, the government places climate change as first priority for policy making, followed by energy security, with peak oil (if it is viewed as a problem at all) in last place. In our view the more serious short-term climate-change impacts – substantial as they will be – will not be the first to wash over our economy. Peak-oil impacts are more likely to arrive first, with 2011-13 being a worryingly early candidate window based on the evidence in Opinion A. The core priorities we think the country faces are the reverse of the government’s current thinking.
This is a serious report with a foreword by Lord Oxburgh, former chair of Shell -
Currently, it seems to us, the government places climate change as first priority for policy making, followed by energy security, with peak oil(if it is viewed as a problem at all) in last place. In our view the more serious short-term climate-change impacts – substantial as they will be – will not be the first to wash over our economy. Peak-oil impacts are more likely to arrive first, with 2011-13 being a worryingly early candidate window based on the evidence in Opinion A. The core priorities we think the country faces are the reverse of the government’s current thinking.
The full report can be downloaded here. A summary from the Arp website can e viewed here and media report is contained in the Guardian.
For me this is one of the most worrying reports I have read - it is not written by environmentalists but by industrialists. They are basically saying that we have ignored the issue of peak oil and in all likelihood the inpacts will be felt in Britain within 5 years - we will be unprepared for the consequences.
Tuesday, 28 October 2008
What is the Transition Initiative?
A very important initiative that has sprung up in the south west in 2005 is the formation of the Transition Towns Initiative. A Transition Town can be best described as ‘a small collection of motivated individuals within a community who come together with a shared concern: how can the community respond to the challenges, and opportunities, of Peak Oil and Climate Change?’
The first Transition Town was set up in Totnes and today there are over 100 TTs around the world and over 600 who are ‘mulling over the idea’.
Transition Initiatives are based on four key assumptions:
- That life with dramatically lower energy consumption is inevitable, and that it is better to plan for it than to be taken by surprise
- That our settlements and communities presently lack the resilience to enable them to weather the severe energy shocks that will accompany peak oil
- That we have to act collectively, and we have to act now
- That by unleashing the collective genius of those around us to creatively and proactively design our energy descent, we can build ways of living that are more connected, more enriching and that recognise the biological limits of our planet.
Full details can be found in The Transition Handbook – from oil dependency to local resilience. Rob Hopkins (2008) Green Books. Totnes.
The table above helps to define the Transition Initiative. There are also six underlying principles that underpin the Transition model which are encapsulated in an Energy Descent Plan. The six principles are:
- Visioning – paint a future without oil where life has improved and developed
- Inclusion – we need to include everyone – not just the ‘green’ ones
- Awareness raising – if we are not all informed of peak oil and climate change we won’t act
- Resilience – the changes ahead will be very challenging so our plans need to include solutions which will survive at the local level
- Psychological insights – many of the barriers to finding solutions lie within our heads – psychology can help us overcome these
- Credible and appropriate solutions – we need solutions which are of a scale, resilience and sustainability to solve the problem
In producing an Energy Descent Plan a scenario is agreed by the group, for example, as a community we must be oil independent by 2030 and we must cut our greenhouse gas emissions by 60% by 2030.
A vision is then drawn up to illustrate the community flourishing in 2030 have achieved the above objectives. The final part of the planning involves ‘back casting’ from the vision date to the present and ascribing a series of actions that will be required every year across the following areas of daily life to achieve the objectives:-
- Food
- Youth & Community
- Education
- Housing
- Economy and Livelihoods
- Health
- Tourism Transport
- Waste
- Energy
- Marine Resources
There is a worked example of an Energy Descent Plan from Kinsdale in Ireland – the first produced in the world.
Arctic ice is thinning
This data is on top of other data which has spectacularly shown that the ice sheet is decreasing in area.
More information here.
Monday, 27 October 2008
Austrialian 'Stern' Report - gloom and doom
Since 2000, the Garnaut report says, global carbon emissions from fossil fuel use have grown by 3% each year, as economies of developing countries including China have boomed. This compares to annual growth rates of 2% through the 1970s and 1980s, and just 1% in the 1990s.
See the Guardian for further details
80% by 2050 to include aviation and shipping
Full details in today's Guardian.
This is amazing stuff - the speed that such huge cuts have been agreed and the 'ease' with which shipping and aviation has now been included almost implies 'they' know something we don't .....!
Richard Heinberg’s The Party’s over oil, war and the fate of industrial societies
In essence the book warns that oil production is about to peak and as a result massive changes will reverberate throughout the world. Indeed the future of industrialisation and globalisation is unsustainable.
The book is divided into 6 chapters.
Chapter 1 reviews the laws of physics, energy in ecology and the role of energy in former dominant civilisations. The key point in the latter example is that that former civilisations (e.g. Myas, Minoans, Greeks & Romans) collapsed because their energy budgets collapsed.
Chapter 2 looks at the rise of energy use from medieval times to the present - the rise of wood through coal to oil.
Chapter 3 describes the concept of peak oil – i.e. oil is a non –renewable resource . It details the work of Hubbert and describes why his work is so important.
Chapter 4 assesses whether renewable sources of energy can replace the oil based alternatives – they can’t and the book describes why.
Chapter 5 entitled “A banquet of consequences” describes what the impacts on modern society of the peaking of oil. It is profoundly and deeply worrying.
Chapter 6 is a much more positive piece of writing giving hope of what can be done at the individual, community and national levels in preparing for the transition from oil to renewables and a different lifestyle.
The book is a really important contribution to the changes society needs to make in the light of diminishing oil resources. It is a useful additional information source to the bulk of climate change literature. It makes it plain that climate change policy cannot be seen in isolation from peak oil issues.
This book is in no large part responsible for the Transition Movement in the UK which started in Totnes, Devon earlier this century.
The book is a brilliant analysis of politics, geopolitics, geology, sociology, ecology and economics. Essential reading – I urge you to read it and get your elected politicians and senior managers to do the same.
Friday, 17 October 2008
Ed Milliband signs up to the Committee on Climate Change
There is however some concern being voiced that shipping and aviation have been excluded from these targets. No doubt this battle will continue. For more details see here.
Wednesday, 15 October 2008
Shifting Shores in the south west

The new report outlines lessons learnt already from work that the Trust has carried out. There are 5 critical messages.
1. Long term planning is essential
2. Work with nature not against it
3. Think and act in the wider context
4. Solutions need partnerships
5. Involving the public is critical.
The report also details 21 NT sites in the SW that are threatened by sea level rise. The report also poses 4 questions that need to be addressed.
1. How can people's awareness and understanding of the risks they face be raised?
2. What is the best way to decide the most sustainable approach to managing these risks?
3. How should tomorrow's coastline be managed today?
4. How can the costs of adaption be minimised and shared equitably?
Finally the report carries out an impact assessment covering
The impact on wildlife
The impact on the historic environment
The impact on the coastal economy
The impact on public access to the coast.
Thursday, 9 October 2008
From Souce to Sea
The full report can be downloaded from here.
One of the recommendations suggests that we should be funding farmers to manage flood plains as flood plains so as to reduce the impacts of flooding downstream.
One of the case studies is at Wicken Fen where such an approach is being implemented. The Wicken Fen Vision is also bringing huge biodiversity, landscape, access and carbon sequestration benefits.
Wednesday, 8 October 2008
Committee on Climate Change
The Committee on Climate Change has made its first pronouncement on how the country / government should implement the Climate Change Bill.
Headed up by Lord Adair Turner they have said that the country needs to cut emissions by at least 80% by 2050. In addition they have said we need to have stopped using fossil fuels completely within 20 years.
These targets should also apply to shipping and aviation.
Amazing - ok, saying it is easier than doing it but it is a fantastic start. There are some really difficult decisions just ahead of us - a third runway for London? - a coal fired power station in Kent? - a barrage for the Severn?
This tied in with appointment of Ed Milliband in the new Department of Energy and Climate is for me a real ray of hope in the often depressing world of climate change politics.
All we have to do now is turn the Climate Change Bill into an Act of Parliament - a job for November
Sunday, 21 September 2008
Bee keepers - Feeding bees - beware
SILVER SPOON BEET SUGAR compared to SILVER SPOON CANE SUGAR
It is reported that neonicotinoid pesticides are being widely used in the spraying of English sugar beet crops. If you plan to feed sugar syrup to your bees this autumn then you might want to check that the sugar you are using is cane sugar and not beet sugar, at least until such time as this latest pesticide concern has been further investigated.
Neonicotinoids have been widely blamed for killing huge numbers of bees and may well be a significant contributory factor to CCD, if not the cause.
Part 2
Several people have asked me for more information about neonicotinoidpesticides and how to avoid them. Google will reveal extensive informationon this topic, and to save you some time, I have compiled some of the moreuseful-looking material into a library at http://www.biobees.com/library/?dir=pesticides_GM_threats - feel free todownload anything from here.
A number of people have asked if they should use organically grown sugar. As a supporter of organic farming, I would love to say an unequivocal 'yes', but apart from the considerable extra cost, I have yet to see any really'white' organic sugar - it always seems to have a slightly brown tinge,which may indicate the presence of residues that may cause digestiveproblems to the bees. I don't know the answer to this one, but whenconsidering feed, we have to remember that we are trying to mimic nectar,which essentially comprises sucrose, glucose and fructose in variedproportions, plus a sprinkling of trace minerals. Refined, white cane sugarmay be as close as we can get at reasonable cost.
Finally, consider this warning from a German beekeeper, in a statement tothe Apimondia gathering in Freiburg. (Clothianidin is another neonicotinoid,closely related to Imidacloprid):"In Germany clothianidin is used since 2004. It is used as seed protectionfor sugar beets and corn. As well as for fumigation of barns and stables. Itaccrues as decomposition product of other pesticides.Already in some regions the concentration in the soil is that high, thatbee-keeping is not possible any more in such regions. It's alarming thatbutter-flies, hoverflies, chrysopids and many other beneficial insects areeliminated or respectively almost eliminated."Read the full text here: http://www.biobees.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1711
There is a growing movement to have the neonicotinoids banned in the UK, asis the case in several other European countries. They are extremelydangerous to bees and all other insects, and thus the birds and otheranimals that rely on insects for food. I urge you to take this threatseriously: only by acting in unison can we counteract the massive financialvested interests behind the promotion of these poisons.
Thursday, 18 September 2008
Food's carbon footprint
Using research mainly from the States the report reveals that greenhouse gas emissions from food account for twice that from travel (8.1 tonnes pa compared to 4.4 tonnes pa per average US household).
Switching to a vegetarian diet from meat would save 1.5 tonnes of CO2 pa per person.
On average consuming organic food compared to conventional food produces only 77% of the greenhouse gases.
When it comes to the debate over whether it is better to eat wild or farmed fish the debate is more complex. However the world's fishing fleet uses 1.2% of global oil consumption (along with over fishing) and the emissions from this are equivalent to the Netherlands annual emissions. However farmed fish requires fish meal is is energy intensive to produce and can cause pollution.
Finally the report addresses whether local food is really green. Their conclusion is controversial - local food only reduces CO2 emissions by4%. However if wider factors are taken into account e.g. the need to prepare for an oil free world (peak oil / transition movement debates) then local food will be a major advantage.
So putting all this together, means that by changing our diets (particularly in the West) we can substantially reduce our carbon footprint. If we assume that the average family is 2.2 people - then by converting to being an 'organic vegetarian' who buys locally the 8.1 tonnes per average family can be cut to 2.6 tonnes - an overall reduction of 68%.
Food for thought!
Old growth forests as carbon sinks
Now a paper has been published in Nature (2008) which shows that old growth forests accumulate carbon over the centuries not just the active growth phase.
30% of the planet's surface is covered by old growth forests and this research suggests that between 0.8 and 1.8 billion tonnes of CO2 is stored annually.
These forests were also excluded from calculations in the Kyoto protocol. It is now clear that ancient forest sinks need to be included in carbon balance calculations.
It doesn't mean than ancient forests will save us from catastrophic climate change - it does mean that if we don't protect them properly even more CO2 will be released into the atmosphere than we originally thought.
Why is the current weather out of kilter with climate change predictions
This seems to make no sense when we have just had two summers of exceptional rain accompanied by lower summer temperatures.
Although this contradiction is not fully understood it is tied in with the jet stream. This is a high level stream of air which affects the weather in Western Europe. In normal years the jet stream comes in from North American crosses the Atlantic at around 12km and ends up in Scandinavia and Iceland and with it brings wet cool weather.
The reason Britain has been so wet over the last two summers is because the jet stream has been forced south and instead of the wet summer weather going to Iceland it has ended up here.
It is thought that one of the major reasons that the jet stream has been pushed south is due to a phenomenon occuring in the Pacific La Nina. This is part of the ocean atmosphere phenomenon known as El Nino. El Nino has two phases La Nina and El Nino - we are currently in the later phase and it is thought that once it switches back to La Nina the jet stream will head north once again.
When El Nino is prevalent heavy rain is experienced in South America, when itis reversed to La Nina then heavy rain is experienced further afield. For more details see the BBC Weather Centre.
Friday, 5 September 2008
British Sea Power
The new turbine will be around 60m by 10m and if sited in the right place around the coast could generate 12Mw of power - enough to supply energy for 12,000 homes.
A much better and less environmentally threatening idea than a barrage across the Severn?
The hurricane season
A recently published paper in Nature by Professor Elsner concludes that warming oceans are driving stronger hurricanes. In a 2007 Nature paper he concluded that climate change was also increasing the frequency of hurricanes.
The recent hurricane even affected the Democratic Convention where one of the debating topics was the call for increased off shore oil drilling. Ironic in a week when the price of oil dropped significantly because the off shore drilling rigs already in operation in the Gulf of Mexico were spared damage by the hurricane.
Peak oil will cause dramatic oil price hikes - the increased frequency and intensity of hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico will cause the same phenomena
Thursday, 21 August 2008
Locals oppose wind farm on Bodmin Moor
Opponents say it will affect wildlife.
The problem is that climate change will affect wildlife too....
Each Briton uses 4,645 litres a day when hidden factors are included

Monday, 4 August 2008
UK emissions have risen not fallen
However a new report from the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) has recalculated UK emissions taking air, shipping and embedded carbon into account. When this is done emissions have risen by 18%.
This makes much more sense! The 5% cut was largely attributable to the switch from coal to gas in electricity generation. The 18% rise as measured by the SEI ties in neatly with our love of consumerism and cheap air travel.
Depressing OK, but at least now we can measures what the 80% cut in emissions required needs to be measured against.
Friday, 4 July 2008
Can Britain feed itself?
This article is an update of paper written by Kenneth Melamby in 1975. It was published in the Land which is an excellent magazine.
A positive upbeat article - life under peak oil and climate change will be very different but we are not necessarily doomed!
Also see the Ecologist about how to feed ourselves organically
Don't let the GM lot fool you.
Peak oil theory in the main stream

Biofuels caused food price rise - official
See this link for further details
Time for a major rethink surely and that rethink must include the point that we need to change our behaviour to use less fuel not just find substitues for oil which make the poor hungry.
Friday, 11 April 2008
The Transition Handbook
Monday, 17 March 2008
Measuring the UK's greenhouse gas emissions
The system the government uses to report to the UN (which shows a cut in greenhouse gases) shows the UK emitted 656m tonnes of CO2 in 2005.
The more accurate and more up to date system (which shows a rise in greenhouse gases) shows the UK emitted 733m tonnes of CO2 in 2005
Down load the report here.
Surely if emissions are rising we need to be honest about it and then amend policy accordingly?
The Secretary of State Hilary Benn responds - you decide if enough is being done.
Friday, 14 March 2008
Nature's capital - National Trust report on land management, climate change and flooding
A new report published by the National Trust today – Nature's Capital – urges the public and private sector to invest new money in helping to deliver major public benefits from land, including reduced risk of flooding and tackling climate change.
Recommendations in the report are based on the Trust’s own practical experience as the largest non-governmental landowner in the UK, managing over 250,000 hectares.
Investment now will save public money later in tackling the problems of climate change, flooding, water pollution and poor health.
The report contains four key recommendations for action:
The water industry should invest in land management to improve the quality of drinking water at source.Nearly two billion pounds has been spent in the last five years on an energy intensive treatment process to make drinking water quality acceptable for consumers. This needs to change and there is a need to tackle the problem at source. A partnership of public, private and voluntary organisations has been working together in the Peak District to tackle the causes of peat degradation which impacts upon water quality. The project will ultimately reduce the need for expensive water treatment.
More of the Government’s £800m flood risk budget should be spent on managing land in a way that makes space for water rather than just spending the money on hard engineering and flood defence.This change of policy would then help to reduce the risk of floods downstream and take into account the impact of climate change and the affects of extreme weather as seen in Gloucestershire and Yorkshire in the summer of 2007. A joint project between the National Trust, Environment Agency and University of Durham at Upper Wharfedale in Yorkshire is seeking to create space for water and tackle the problem of flash flooding via wetland creation and soft engineering.
Extend the use of carbon markets to provide financial incentives for investment in land based carbon, such as peat bogs, to reduce losses of carbon from soil.Over 10 billion tonnes of carbon is estimated to be stored in UK soil – equivalent to around a year and a half of global greenhouse gas emissions - and the peatlands are the single largest store of carbon in the UK. A carbon audit at the National Trust’s Wallington Estate in Northumberland is assessing the amount of carbon stored in its soil and biomass and how much is emitted through day to day operations. An essential part of this project will be to restore and conserve the carbon banks.
There is a need for more NHS and Primary Care Trust funding to be allocated for green exercise prescriptions in the outdoors.This would help get more people out into their local green spaces to tackle obesity and improve their health and well-being. At the National Trust’s Clumber Park in Nottinghamshire the local council and health authorities have been prescribing healthy walking to help tackle the obesity problems in the East Midlands.
Tony Burton, Director of Policy and Strategy at the National Trust, said:
'With a changing climate and rising demands for new built development, the pressure on land is increasing. We need to harness new sources of investment and new partnerships to realise the potential of our land to help tackle flooding, climate change and the supply of clean water and green spaces for the benefit of us all.'
The Green Budget!
Darling suggested that the Climate Change Bill would probably have to 'recommend' 80% CO2 cuts by 2050 rather than the published 60% cuts. Good stuff but ...
how to achieve 80% cuts?
- defer the fuel escalator - well, no that wont help....
- promote more new roads - well, no that wont help....
- promote new runways at Heathrow and Stanstead - well, no that wont help....
and positive noises about carbon neutral homes
and of course the plastics bags! If supermarkets don't reduce plastic bag then the government will legislate.
In order to cut emissions by 80% its going to need more than a plastic bags ban surely?
Thursday, 13 March 2008
Organic milk and carbon emissions
Thanks Friends of the Earth Tip of the Day
Six degrees videos
I recommended Mark Lynas' book Six Degrees in an earlier blog.
Mark has now teamed up with National Geographic Magazine in the States to produce a website along with a series of summary videos of the 6 degrees message. Six individual videos have been produced featuring Mark Lynas and NASA scientist James Hansen. Each video is featured below.
Friday, 7 March 2008
New coal fired power station - surely not?

The Camp for Climate Action will be held from August 4-11 at the site of Kingsnorth in Kent, where German energy company E.On is proposing to build the country's first new coal-fired power station in 30 years." reports the Guardian - surely the Government will block this - otherwise our climate change policy is in tatters?
Train, plane and bus tickets should show carbon footprint
"Plane and train tickets should reveal the environmental impact of individual journeys by stating the carbon emissions released on each trip, the UK's main professional body for engineers said yesterday.
The Institute of Mechanical Engineers said branding tickets according to their green credentials should be one of a series of measures the government should adopt, so that having a large carbon footprint became "as socially unacceptable as drink-driving".
In a report on sustainable transport, the body highlighted trains as one of the most environmentally benign ways to travel and put forward strategies to wean people away from travelling by car or plane, including extra fuel taxes, congestion charges and more aggressive road pricing.
For a 400-mile trip from London to Glasgow, the carbon dioxide emissions per passenger travelling by road are 80.2kg, compared with 133.7kg by air and 46.8kg by rail, the report said."
For further details see the IME
Very rude but pertinent
Not for the easily offended though .....
http://www.feelfilms.co.uk/smiths/index.html
You have been warned
Water voles - oh dear oh dear
Water voles need a climate too surely?
Food crisis
As the world population rises from 6 to 9 billion will the world be able to feed itself? How do biofuels fit into into this?
Watch out for Prof John Beddington - he is on the case! ...... I hope ....
Lets see if the biofuels policy changes ..... - it surely must
A great guy but too depressing
I can't accept this - if we act now WE WILL BE OK
Your choice - do nothing or something
SINK OR SWIM
BREATH or SUFFOCATE
SING OR HOWL
Lets see what the carbon weevils are up to

Thursday, 6 March 2008
Green taxes and government policy - its a ghetto out there
The 2007 Pre–Budget Report and Comprehensive Spending Review: An environmental analysis
The report can be downloaded in full from here.
In summary the report concludes:-
environmental taxes as a proportion of all taxation peaked at 9.7% in 1999 and have declined ever since, falling to 7.3% in 2006
Overall, environmental issues appear to be ‘ghettoised’; the Treasury must do more to mainstream environmental policy by reflecting it more strongly throughout the entire range of PSAs.
Although the Pre-Budget Report and Comprehensive Spending Review were published a year after the Stern Review, there was little sign in them that the Treasury was responding on the scale and with the urgency Stern recommended. Furthermore, since the Stern Review was published the science on climate change has continued to harden, with global emissions rising faster than projected; thus the Treasury’s lack of urgency stands out as even more remiss. Pre-Budget Report 2008 must establish a coherent set of measures to help deliver the UK’s 2020 domestic and EU targets on emissions and renewable energy, and show explicitly what their planned contribution to this delivery will be.
Wednesday, 23 January 2008
Monday, 21 January 2008
Are biofuels sustainable?
They gave a pretty resounding no in their report. The EU has a target to ensure that 10% of transport fuel comes from biofuels by 2020. The MPs have called for a moratorium on this target. See also 'The Problem with biofuels'.
Download the Report here
This is from the report's summary
"Biofuels can reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road transport—but most first generation biofuels have a detrimental impact on the environment overall. In addition, most biofuels are often not an effective use of bioenergy resources, in terms either of cutting greenhouse gas emissions or value-for-money. The Government must ensure that its biofuels policy balances greenhouse gas emission cuts with wider environmental impacts, so that biofuels are only used where they contribute to sustainable emissions reductions."
"The Government should seek to ensure that EU policy changes to reflect the concerns raised in this report. This means implementing a moratorium on current targets until technology improves, robust mechanisms to prevent damaging land use change are developed, and international sustainability standards are agreed. Only then might biofuels have a role to play. In the meantime, other more effective ways of cutting emissions from road transport should be pursued. It will take considerable courage for the Government and EU to admit that the current policy arrangements for biofuels are inappropriate. The policy realignments that are required will be a test of the Government’s commitment to moving the UK towards a sustainable low carbon economy."
RSPB's 20 tough climate change questions
Birds on the move
Sunday, 20 January 2008
Energy descent plans

Friday, 18 January 2008
The problems with biofuels
On the 14th January this year te Guardian carried an article - Biofuels may not deliver CO2 cuts scientists warn. This was based on a recent report by the Royal Society no less Sustainable biofuels challenges and prospects. The author of the report Professor John Pickett gave an interview about his report highlighting the issues and dangers.
In essence growing the wrong types of crop to produce biofuels may impact on biodiversity detrimentally and may take farmland used to produce food out of production (see the Guardian 4th Jan 08). We may end up with lots of fuel for our cars but end up living in a world with no nature and nothing to eat!
The UK, European and world policies on biofuels need really careful consideration and if we get the policy wrong we may end up in a worst position than we already find ourselves. BiofuelWatch is an excellent website which gives the global perspective.
Finally there is an excellent article in the current edition of Ecos on biofuels by Andrew Boswell of BiofuelWatch.
ECOS: Climate chaos - helping nature cope

One Planet Agriculture

UK Climate Change data - UKCIP
This is the web site for the definitive data set for climate change in the UK - includes regional data for Devon and Cornwall
Southwest Environement Home Page
The impacts of climate change in Devon and Cornwall
The end of oil?

Wednesday, 16 January 2008
Shifting shores

Forecast changeable

Tuesday, 15 January 2008
Woodlands, trees and climate change
